Comments on: Has Associated Content Cheapened SEO Copywriting? https://seocopywriting.com/has-associated-content-cheapened-seo-copywriting/ SEO Copywriting Training and Content Writing Tips Tue, 08 Jan 2019 17:02:47 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.2 By: 2013 recap for SEO copywriters: What's cool, what sucked https://seocopywriting.com/has-associated-content-cheapened-seo-copywriting/#comment-4794 Thu, 12 Dec 2013 12:31:06 +0000 http://www.seocopywriting.com/?p=2634#comment-4794 […] wasn’t so long ago that I was railing against content farms and spammy search results. This year, Google has made some major strides that changed the game and […]

]]>
By: SEO Copywriting | No one engine should have all that power https://seocopywriting.com/has-associated-content-cheapened-seo-copywriting/#comment-4793 Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:36:07 +0000 http://www.seocopywriting.com/?p=2634#comment-4793 […] search engines purchase “content mill” companies (I’m looking at you, Yahoo,) where writers are paid bottom-dollar…and the quality is […]

]]>
By: SEO Copywriting | SEO content marketing roundup, week ending July 28th https://seocopywriting.com/has-associated-content-cheapened-seo-copywriting/#comment-4792 Wed, 28 Jul 2010 05:13:33 +0000 http://www.seocopywriting.com/?p=2634#comment-4792 […] may recall the recent buzz /controversy over content mills/farming?  Well, take at look at this:  Blekko may be in prime position to become the new search tool of […]

]]>
By: Russ Henneberry https://seocopywriting.com/has-associated-content-cheapened-seo-copywriting/#comment-4791 Mon, 19 Jul 2010 21:10:13 +0000 http://www.seocopywriting.com/?p=2634#comment-4791 I am unfortunately intimately familiar with paying copywriters for poor SEO copywriting and plastering it on clients websites (from a former job I held.)

This process can work (from time to time) for SEO agencies that promise nothing but better rankings but it does nothing for every other metric that should be considered.

Last time I checked traffic doesn’t generate sales, conversions do.

]]>
By: SEO Copywriting | SEO content marketing roundup, week ending July 14th https://seocopywriting.com/has-associated-content-cheapened-seo-copywriting/#comment-4790 Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:36:11 +0000 http://www.seocopywriting.com/?p=2634#comment-4790 […] content quality debate is far from over!  A completely different take on web content mills (“content farming”), such […]

]]>
By: Laura Crest https://seocopywriting.com/has-associated-content-cheapened-seo-copywriting/#comment-4789 Thu, 08 Jul 2010 23:14:31 +0000 http://www.seocopywriting.com/?p=2634#comment-4789 Thank you, Heather,

for a number of things, like:

1) Citing specific evidence backing up my largely prideful and intuitive decision to NOT write for Demand Media (or Suite 101, or ODesk, or Hub Pages, or…sadly ad infinitum…)

2) Reminding web owners — ONCE AGAIN! — that they indeed do get what they pay for. If they’re paying next to nothing for content kicked out on a production line that pays its mediocre writers sh#t wages, then that is PRECISELY what they are gonna get: sh#t copy.

3) Putting Yahoo on Notice: Yes, shame, shame, shame on you, Yahoo. Bad juju, not good! And yes, you really should know better.

]]>
By: Heather https://seocopywriting.com/has-associated-content-cheapened-seo-copywriting/#comment-4788 Thu, 08 Jul 2010 19:58:52 +0000 http://www.seocopywriting.com/?p=2634#comment-4788 In reply to Derek Cromwell.

Wow, Derek – thanks for your first-hand account.

I totally understand how cheap content is big business – I do. Heck, that’s why folks hire offshore companies (with disastrous results, naturally.)

But for Yahoo – a search engine (and a company that has been near and dear to my heart since Inktomi days) to implicitly endorse the “cheap copy” mantra…well…that just bugs me. They have the opportunity to raise the bar, set standards (like they’re trying to do with their Style Guide) and really help companies.

Sad. So sad.

]]>
By: Derek Cromwell https://seocopywriting.com/has-associated-content-cheapened-seo-copywriting/#comment-4787 Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:20:19 +0000 http://www.seocopywriting.com/?p=2634#comment-4787 I actually got my start writing for Associated Content several years ago, and I couldn’t agree more that they have a “write it fast and get it turned in” mentality, especially for new writers.

You cited that the pay range goes from $2 to $15 per article. That might be what they state, but I speak from experience (having over 60 articles on their site myself) that they pay as low as possible. Even articles that I painstakingly edited over and over didn’t fetch more than $9.

Their performance payments are where people find the most payout over the long term but that just makes the rush mentality even worse. Once you’re an “approved” content producer (you’ve submitted more than 3 approved articles) you’re able to publish for performance pay without your article being reviewed by editors. That means that anyone can post anything – similar to the terrible piece you found on SEO copywriting.

I don’t write for AC anymore, it’s been a long time since I’ve contributed anything but it continues to be a sweatshop for writers wanting to make money that can’t or won’t strike out on their own.

I used to argue with people about quality in the AC forums, and was frequently told that if I wanted better I should go somewhere else. So I did – self-employment :D

]]>